it was an absolutely glorious morning, a slow drawling morning that i've always had for the last few weekends. time to head down to the rink to view the nationals for iceskating.
when i got out of the lift to fuji ice, i saw some familiar faces - so i greeted them "good morning". one of the people at the table was
laura, and even before i got to the turnstiles, the first thing she said to me in reply to my greeting was something in the likes of "
of all the four photographers i contacted, you have the worst attitude". huh? what did i do wrong - if i'm not shooting as an official photographer for the event, surely i do not need to be barred from the competition by the national sporting association (nsa) - even if i didn't infringe our mutual agreement of not shooting? and especially when i haven't even stepped on her toes for the day? i wondered why she would say something so scathing in response to a morning greeting, even
before i stepped into the rink premises. i was sticking to my agreement of not shooting pictures, and just only being present to give support as a friend to my newly-known acquaintances and friends - one's presence by itself can show how true a friend one can be. what's wrong with being there at an event, although i'm not the official photographer - even if i'm sticking to the agreement of not shooting at all? so i just dismissed that statement from her. nevertheless, some people (including some mothers) could witness her snarling at me, since they were in close proximity and could hear her words clearly. in fact, one of the mothers shrugged in curiosity when she heard that outburst. could i be "a friend" or "a spectator" instead of "the photographer"?
i was excited, since the mood presented was somewhat reminiscent of skate singapore, albeit with severely less spectators. all the time, my eyes were drifting around aimlessly, since i didn't want to drag any particular skater(s) and/or the family into hot soup along with me. most of them understood that i was there and i was going to honour my word of not shooting, since i had no other choice and i definitely wasn't going to back out on it. only hours later did i find out that
laura was going all around telling the parents not to get photos from me anyway. huh? why tell the parents not to get photos from me if i am not even shooting the event? all my photos would already be from the practices and such - since i can't shoot, how would i have photos for anyone to buy from? where's the logic? was she trying to ask people to boycott me? similar to what i heard of only family members are allowed to take photos? i don't know. i'm getting all this information in bits and pieces from all over, and i'm trying to do the complex mental jigsaw puzzle.
trying to watch the skating itself was not an easy thing - with her constantly pacing up and down and around, there was a sense of inevitable conflict that was about to be unleashed. as i was letting my eyes scan haphazardly around the rink, i saw a familiar face in an orange windbreaker -
ah pao! he was the only person from my newly created clubsnap sportsshooting group who turned up to try the iceskating shoot. since his lens was a slower variable-aperture lens, i decided to pass him my equipment and let him shoot instead. i began with passing him my lens and monopod, but eventually my entire setup, minus the compactflash card. after all, since i can't use what i have, why not let him use my equipment, so he can get better pictures with it? we were through a few skaters, then
laura jumped on us suddenly and said a whole lot of stuff that shouldn't have been said at all. she suggested that since there are "very young children" there skating in the event, she wouldn't know what we were "going to do with the photos". indirectly, she seemed to suggest that we had some possibility of being involved in paedophilia. oh great. it isn't as if none of the parents know me - in fact, at least four parents and skaters asked me to take photos for them, but i declined since i already had the agreement not to shoot. hey, it's not as if i'm completely unknown to all the skaters and their families. why would she want to do all that?
and on top of that, she insisted that i had planned to contravene the mutual no-shooting agreement, and i had instead been using and framing another person instead of myself. she insisted she knew what i was up to, without even giving
ah pao a chance to explain his presence and his interest in shooting sports, since she filled in the storyline using her very vivid-but-delusional imagination. boy, she said she was disgusted with me - i did feel it was very unprofessional of a vicepresident of a national sporting association to speak the way she did to the both of us - speaking with a temper
and seemingly suggesting something that was probably libellous. it didn't help to show her my nie matriculation card - she didn't bother to look, and was firing at
ah pao endlessly, instead of looking at me. we both got sick of trying to talk to her and explaining that he was learning how to shoot iceskating because of the challenge, as well as the part about me lending my equipment since his equipment wouldn't allow him to take decent shots. if she had hearing problems or not, i don't know. one thing for sure - she was very animated, totally different from the usually dormant persona she portrays. she sure could make
catherine lim blush and go into self-exile, i'm sure. but really, it was very unprofessional of a senior office bearer for a nsa to speak the way she did to us. she said too, that we would have to write in to the association to gain permission for photos - but would i expect to get it, after being a potential competitor to her sale of photographs? i think not. she was off the mark herself, since there was no statement on
ssc's webpage for iceskating nationals to outlaw photography save for the official photographer. huh? she gave us an ultimatum - to keep the camera gear, or just to be "invited" out of the venue. we chose the former.
so after keeping the photogear away, both me and
ah pao sat down and i just shared with him my thoughts about sports photography, iceskating etc. when i spotted
mr lim chee kiat, president of sisa, i went over to him along with
ah pao and we gave feedback to him regarding the behaviour of his erm...
vicepresident, as well as gain some clarification upon the matter. he was a very good example of what to be - and he handled our feedback with tact and diplomacy. as i understood later on over lunch, the demonstration of such behaviour from
laura was apparently nothing new.
unexpectedly, my previous post about
sisa and the rationale has been demonstrated, and experienced "live" to the max by
ah pao. who are the ones who are going to bring the sport to higher ground? it's the management - in this case, sisa. but with a vicepresident who lashes words like a cat-o'-nine-tails, where is the sport going to move locally? i'm all for promoting of sports - this i feel is a hallmark of pess folks - but i'm given suspicion instead? what's the purpose of the nsa holding only one competition a calendar year, and titling that very top-scoring skater as "champion", when the competition pool is so shallow? i'm not belittling the champion - i must agree that they are very worthy of the title, but how is the association going to help get more people who may have potential but are financially lacking to get started into competitive skating, to increase the base standard of skating locally? without a larger base pool of competitive skaters, you can't really push the bar of standards higher. so how could it be possible to field a skater at the 2014 winter olympics for the nation as stated
in this ssc webpage?
anyway, since my
project top secret has already concluded, i shall move on with other photography other than iceskating. it was a fantastic time with
jonnansical, who was a fantastic inspiration, friend, and most importantly, skater. i've had my fair share of brickbats in this nsa whose sport i'm learning, and i don't think it's worth continuing on further. at any point of time, i can access ivp level games with blessings - why for stick to a niche sport that is being run into the ground? how much promotion did they do for the sport, that at least the viewing galleries are all filled with spectators? hardly. how many people on the street are even
aware there's a nationals for iceskating? i don't want to guess - i may be well off the mark. red tape, bad manners exist in this sport. i really am puzzled why there are still skaters who are skating - what is the draw about it, that similarly draws a moth to a fire? i'm glad to have talked to all these amazing and graceful skaters - they did show me a thing about the sport that i never knew existed - that there was a close-knit fraternity locally, well and alive - sadly, it may be threatened by the sheer lack of local support.
met
"sonya" rizal when i was about to head for the terminal 2 bus stop - i'd mistook him for my 6 discom unit mate... oops! at the end of the day, it is nice to know i'm remembered by
alice for helping her to get shots of her children skating, with that small little pack of "sweethearts" candy.
a flight out to australia is a joyful thing. it is, indeed, the beginning to a new chapter in her skating. the girls were crying in an infectious manner, thankfully my resistance was high. till may 10th (???), so long for now,
jonnansical!